<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (11) TMI 2077 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472196</link>
    <description>Section 148 notices issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officers, rather than through the faceless reassessment regime, were treated as inconsistent with Section 151A and the applicable notification. Applying the stated jurisdictional precedent and co-ordinate bench approach, invalid initiation of reassessment also defeated the consequential reassessment and related addition. The deletion of the addition was therefore sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 22:34:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (11) TMI 2077 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472196</link>
      <description>Section 148 notices issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officers, rather than through the faceless reassessment regime, were treated as inconsistent with Section 151A and the applicable notification. Applying the stated jurisdictional precedent and co-ordinate bench approach, invalid initiation of reassessment also defeated the consequential reassessment and related addition. The deletion of the addition was therefore sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>