<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1519 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472169</link>
    <description>Alternative statutory remedy under Section 30 permits the statutory authority to consider challenges to GST registration cancellation, including alleged lack of hearing and breach of natural justice. Writ jurisdiction need not be exercised where revocation proceedings provide that avenue. The writ petition challenging cancellation was dismissed without adjudicating either the cancellation&#039;s validity or the natural-justice allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 11:18:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1519 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472169</link>
      <description>Alternative statutory remedy under Section 30 permits the statutory authority to consider challenges to GST registration cancellation, including alleged lack of hearing and breach of natural justice. Writ jurisdiction need not be exercised where revocation proceedings provide that avenue. The writ petition challenging cancellation was dismissed without adjudicating either the cancellation&#039;s validity or the natural-justice allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>