<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1513 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472167</link>
    <description>Criminal complaints instituted after cheque-dishonour proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act require scrutiny for misuse of criminal process. Where the record and surrounding circumstances show that the allegations are absurd, continuation of the prosecution amounts to an abuse of process. On those facts, the criminal complaint and consequential proceedings against the appellant were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 10:48:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1513 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472167</link>
      <description>Criminal complaints instituted after cheque-dishonour proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act require scrutiny for misuse of criminal process. Where the record and surrounding circumstances show that the allegations are absurd, continuation of the prosecution amounts to an abuse of process. On those facts, the criminal complaint and consequential proceedings against the appellant were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>