https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800074 Recall jurisdiction over ex parte procedural orders must be exercised consistently with procedural fairness. An application cannot be treated as substantially delayed when it was filed under express liberty granted by the Adjudicating Authority, especially where an earlier application mistakenly targeted a later order, its reply was already on record, and the substantive proceeding remained pending. The delay-based rejection was unsustainable; the ex parte order was recalled as against the appellant, enabling it to contest the pending proceeding. en-us Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Oct 2026 07:40:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800074 Recall jurisdiction over ex parte procedural orders must be exercised consistently with procedural fairness. An application cannot be treated as substantially delayed when it was filed under express liberty granted by the Adjudicating Authority, especially where an earlier application mistakenly targeted a later order, its reply was already on record, and the substantive proceeding remained pending. The delay-based rejection was unsustainable; the ex parte order was recalled as against the appellant, enabling it to contest the pending proceeding. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800074