<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 49 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800106</link>
    <description>Objections to reopening, once recorded reasons are supplied, must be decided by a separate speaking order before reassessment proceeds under Sections 147 and 144B. Addressing those objections during assessment does not satisfy this mandatory procedural requirement. Failure to issue the prior speaking order constitutes a jurisdictional defect, cannot be cured through remand for fresh consideration, and invalidates the reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 07:40:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 49 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800106</link>
      <description>Objections to reopening, once recorded reasons are supplied, must be decided by a separate speaking order before reassessment proceeds under Sections 147 and 144B. Addressing those objections during assessment does not satisfy this mandatory procedural requirement. Failure to issue the prior speaking order constitutes a jurisdictional defect, cannot be cured through remand for fresh consideration, and invalidates the reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>