<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 90 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800147</link>
    <description>Failure to afford a further hearing after an appeal&#039;s transfer, issuance of a fresh hearing notice, and a requested adjournment undermines procedural fairness. Where an appellate order follows without any further hearing pursuant to that notice, the appeal requires fresh adjudication after the petitioner receives a meaningful opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 07:40:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 90 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800147</link>
      <description>Failure to afford a further hearing after an appeal&#039;s transfer, issuance of a fresh hearing notice, and a requested adjournment undermines procedural fairness. Where an appellate order follows without any further hearing pursuant to that notice, the appeal requires fresh adjudication after the petitioner receives a meaningful opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>