<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 97 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800154</link>
    <description>Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act extends penalty exposure to any person, including non-taxable or unregistered persons, only where both conditions are established: retention of benefit from a specified Section 122(1) transaction and conduct of that transaction at the person&#039;s instance. Its penal consequences require prospective application, so it applies only to underlying acts or transactions occurring on or after 1 January 2021, not by reference to the show-cause notice date. Statutory appellate remedies do not prevent consideration of recurring pure legal questions, while transaction dates and proof of the twin conditions require evidentiary determination in the appellate process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 07:40:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 97 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800154</link>
      <description>Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act extends penalty exposure to any person, including non-taxable or unregistered persons, only where both conditions are established: retention of benefit from a specified Section 122(1) transaction and conduct of that transaction at the person&#039;s instance. Its penal consequences require prospective application, so it applies only to underlying acts or transactions occurring on or after 1 January 2021, not by reference to the show-cause notice date. Statutory appellate remedies do not prevent consideration of recurring pure legal questions, while transaction dates and proof of the twin conditions require evidentiary determination in the appellate process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>