<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 1688 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472144</link>
    <description>Consent reference of contractual disputes to a sole arbitrator resulted in pending court proceedings being remitted for treatment as an application for interim measures under Section 17. The existing status quo arrangement continued temporarily, subject to the arbitral tribunal&#039;s power to extend, vary, or modify interlocutory arrangements. Interim and merits-related issues were to be pursued before the tribunal, with all merits left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 19:00:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 1688 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472144</link>
      <description>Consent reference of contractual disputes to a sole arbitrator resulted in pending court proceedings being remitted for treatment as an application for interim measures under Section 17. The existing status quo arrangement continued temporarily, subject to the arbitral tribunal&#039;s power to extend, vary, or modify interlocutory arrangements. Interim and merits-related issues were to be pursued before the tribunal, with all merits left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>