<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 198 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54247</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving duty demands on the manufacturing of &quot;Activated Bleaching Earth&quot; and &quot;Activated Carbon.&quot; The Tribunal held that the demands were not time-barred but found that the plea for cum duty benefit and exclusion of carbon value was not adequately considered. It was observed that clubbing clearances of the assessee with another unit without issuing a Show Cause Notice was unjustified, as evidence showed the separate nature of both units. The matter was remanded for re-consideration, emphasizing the need to consider cum duty benefit and exclude Activated Carbon value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:37:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 198 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54247</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving duty demands on the manufacturing of &quot;Activated Bleaching Earth&quot; and &quot;Activated Carbon.&quot; The Tribunal held that the demands were not time-barred but found that the plea for cum duty benefit and exclusion of carbon value was not adequately considered. It was observed that clubbing clearances of the assessee with another unit without issuing a Show Cause Notice was unjustified, as evidence showed the separate nature of both units. The matter was remanded for re-consideration, emphasizing the need to consider cum duty benefit and exclude Activated Carbon value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>