<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 197 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54246</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the customs department&#039;s decision to enhance the value of imported ball bearings, ruling in favor of the appellant. The appellant successfully argued that the consignment was a stock lot, supported by documentation and supplier confirmation. The Tribunal found the discount acceptable, following the precedent set in Mirah Exports Ltd. case, and concluded that the enhancement of value was unjustified. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and provided consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:35:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 197 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54246</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the customs department&#039;s decision to enhance the value of imported ball bearings, ruling in favor of the appellant. The appellant successfully argued that the consignment was a stock lot, supported by documentation and supplier confirmation. The Tribunal found the discount acceptable, following the precedent set in Mirah Exports Ltd. case, and concluded that the enhancement of value was unjustified. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal and provided consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>