https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472128 Inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings is limited to determining whether a complaint prima facie discloses offences; it cannot be used for a mini-trial requiring evaluation of evidence. Allegations that company directors were appointed without authority and forged documents were uploaded with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs to secure control of the company disclosed serious offences requiring trial. Parallel civil disputes did not eliminate the criminal character of those allegations. Criminal proceedings therefore remained liable to proceed rather than be quashed. en-us Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Sep 2026 11:55:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472128 Inherent jurisdiction to quash criminal proceedings is limited to determining whether a complaint prima facie discloses offences; it cannot be used for a mini-trial requiring evaluation of evidence. Allegations that company directors were appointed without authority and forged documents were uploaded with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs to secure control of the company disclosed serious offences requiring trial. Parallel civil disputes did not eliminate the criminal character of those allegations. Criminal proceedings therefore remained liable to proceed rather than be quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472128