<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 964 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472126</link>
    <description>Section 127 of the Income-tax Act requires the competent authority to give a reasoned determination when an assessee objects to a proposed transfer of jurisdiction. A transfer order cannot merely state that objections were considered and found untenable; it must disclose reasons and address the assessee&#039;s submissions. Failure to record reasons invalidates the transfer order and requires fresh determination after proper consideration of the objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 11:11:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 964 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472126</link>
      <description>Section 127 of the Income-tax Act requires the competent authority to give a reasoned determination when an assessee objects to a proposed transfer of jurisdiction. A transfer order cannot merely state that objections were considered and found untenable; it must disclose reasons and address the assessee&#039;s submissions. Failure to record reasons invalidates the transfer order and requires fresh determination after proper consideration of the objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>