<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2162 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472104</link>
    <description>Unexplained cash-credit addition under section 68 depended solely on directors&#039; statements admitting accommodation entries. Statements unaccompanied by relevant corroborative evidence were insufficient to sustain the addition. The earlier larger addition had been deleted in principle during remand proceedings. The remaining disputed addition was therefore deleted in favour of the assessee, removing the residual section 68 liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:42:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2162 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472104</link>
      <description>Unexplained cash-credit addition under section 68 depended solely on directors&#039; statements admitting accommodation entries. Statements unaccompanied by relevant corroborative evidence were insufficient to sustain the addition. The earlier larger addition had been deleted in principle during remand proceedings. The remaining disputed addition was therefore deleted in favour of the assessee, removing the residual section 68 liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>