<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2170 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472112</link>
    <description>Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) requires the administrative-expense disallowance to be computed using the average value of investments that actually yielded exempt income during the relevant year. Including all investments shown in the balance sheet, irrespective of whether they generated exempt income, is inconsistent with this approach. The disallowance should therefore be recomputed by excluding investments that did not yield exempt income during the year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:42:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2170 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472112</link>
      <description>Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) requires the administrative-expense disallowance to be computed using the average value of investments that actually yielded exempt income during the relevant year. Including all investments shown in the balance sheet, irrespective of whether they generated exempt income, is inconsistent with this approach. The disallowance should therefore be recomputed by excluding investments that did not yield exempt income during the year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>