<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 2045 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800019</link>
    <description>Section 14A read with Rule 8D permits disallowance only for expenditure directly connected with earning exempt income. Where surplus own funds sufficiently cover investments generating exempt income, no financial expenditure can be attributed to those investments. In the absence of a demonstrated nexus between expenditure and exempt income, a proportionate or estimated disallowance is unjustified. Application of Rule 8D therefore does not warrant a disallowance on those facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:41:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 2045 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800019</link>
      <description>Section 14A read with Rule 8D permits disallowance only for expenditure directly connected with earning exempt income. Where surplus own funds sufficiently cover investments generating exempt income, no financial expenditure can be attributed to those investments. In the absence of a demonstrated nexus between expenditure and exempt income, a proportionate or estimated disallowance is unjustified. Application of Rule 8D therefore does not warrant a disallowance on those facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=800019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>