<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs broker abetment requires proof of knowledge, collusion or active assistance, not merely alleged IEC verification failure.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104342</link>
    <description>Penal liability of a Customs Broker for abetment of attempted Red Sanders export requires evidence of a positive act, prior knowledge, active collusion, or assistance; failure alone to verify an IEC holder does not establish abetment. Where the Broker obtained and verified KYC and IEC documents, co-operated with the investigation, and no evidence linked it to the attempted smuggling, the Tribunal found no basis for an abetment penalty. The penalty was set aside, and the Revenue&#039;s attempt to impose an additional penalty was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:41:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:41:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs broker abetment requires proof of knowledge, collusion or active assistance, not merely alleged IEC verification failure.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104342</link>
      <description>Penal liability of a Customs Broker for abetment of attempted Red Sanders export requires evidence of a positive act, prior knowledge, active collusion, or assistance; failure alone to verify an IEC holder does not establish abetment. Where the Broker obtained and verified KYC and IEC documents, co-operated with the investigation, and no evidence linked it to the attempted smuggling, the Tribunal found no basis for an abetment penalty. The penalty was set aside, and the Revenue&#039;s attempt to impose an additional penalty was rejected.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:41:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>