<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PMLA property retention permits prima facie proceeds-of-crime inquiry beyond accused ownership, absent prejudice from defective notice service.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104335</link>
    <description>Retention of seized jewellery under PMLA was sustained because interlinked accounts, fund movements and jewellery payments supplied a prima facie nexus with proceeds of crime. The inquiry may cover property held by a person not accused of the scheduled offence where the property is connected with, or requires examination regarding, such proceeds. Recovery from a joint family residence and lack of transaction-wise tracing for individual items did not negate the nexus. Defective initial service of notice did not invalidate adjudication because participation and opportunity to defend caused no identified prejudice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:41:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:41:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=927025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PMLA property retention permits prima facie proceeds-of-crime inquiry beyond accused ownership, absent prejudice from defective notice service.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104335</link>
      <description>Retention of seized jewellery under PMLA was sustained because interlinked accounts, fund movements and jewellery payments supplied a prima facie nexus with proceeds of crime. The inquiry may cover property held by a person not accused of the scheduled offence where the property is connected with, or requires examination regarding, such proceeds. Recovery from a joint family residence and lack of transaction-wise tracing for individual items did not negate the nexus. Defective initial service of notice did not invalidate adjudication because participation and opportunity to defend caused no identified prejudice.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 08:41:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>