<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Evidence as to document unmeaning reference to existing facts</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=56409</link>
    <description>Evidence of peculiar meaning is admissible where documentary language is plain on its face but unmeaning when applied to existing facts. Extrinsic evidence may establish that the words were used in a peculiar sense and identify the intended subject matter. Where a deed refers to a house in a place where the transferor owns none, evidence of ownership of a house elsewhere and the transferee&#039;s possession may show that the deed concerned that other house.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 18:00:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 18:00:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Evidence as to document unmeaning reference to existing facts</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=56409</link>
      <description>Evidence of peculiar meaning is admissible where documentary language is plain on its face but unmeaning when applied to existing facts. Extrinsic evidence may establish that the words were used in a peculiar sense and identify the intended subject matter. Where a deed refers to a house in a place where the transferor owns none, evidence of ownership of a house elsewhere and the transferee&#039;s possession may show that the deed concerned that other house.</description>
      <category>Act-Rules</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 18:00:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=56409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>