<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Presumption as to electronic records five years old</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=56404</link>
    <description>Section 90A permits the Court to presume that an electronic signature was affixed by the identified person or an authorised person when a five-year-old electronic record is produced from proper custody. Proper custody includes the place and care in which the record would naturally be kept, while custody with a proved or probable legitimate origin is not improper. The same custody explanation applies to the electronic-record presumption under section 81A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 17:59:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 17:59:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Presumption as to electronic records five years old</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=56404</link>
      <description>Section 90A permits the Court to presume that an electronic signature was affixed by the identified person or an authorised person when a five-year-old electronic record is produced from proper custody. Proper custody includes the place and care in which the record would naturally be kept, while custody with a proved or probable legitimate origin is not improper. The same custody explanation applies to the electronic-record presumption under section 81A.</description>
      <category>Act-Rules</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 17:59:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=56404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>