<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of Court, may be proved</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=56345</link>
    <description>Section 44 permits any party to a suit or other proceeding to challenge a judgment, order, or decree relied upon and proved by the adverse party where it is relevant under the provisions governing prior judgments. The party may establish that the deciding court lacked competence or that the judgment was procured through fraud or collusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:32:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:32:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of Court, may be proved</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=56345</link>
      <description>Section 44 permits any party to a suit or other proceeding to challenge a judgment, order, or decree relied upon and proved by the adverse party where it is relevant under the provisions governing prior judgments. The party may establish that the deciding court lacked competence or that the judgment was procured through fraud or collusion.</description>
      <category>Act-Rules</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:32:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=56345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>