<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Judgments, etc., other than those mentioned in sections 40, 41 and 42, when relevant</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=56344</link>
    <description>Judgments, orders and decrees outside sections 40, 41 and 42 are generally irrelevant unless their existence is a fact in issue or they are independently relevant under another provision. A prior adjudication involving other parties ordinarily cannot establish disputed facts in later proceedings. It may, however, be relevant to show motive, while a previous conviction is relevant when it is itself a fact in issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:31:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:31:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Judgments, etc., other than those mentioned in sections 40, 41 and 42, when relevant</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=56344</link>
      <description>Judgments, orders and decrees outside sections 40, 41 and 42 are generally irrelevant unless their existence is a fact in issue or they are independently relevant under another provision. A prior adjudication involving other parties ordinarily cannot establish disputed facts in later proceedings. It may, however, be relevant to show motive, while a previous conviction is relevant when it is itself a fact in issue.</description>
      <category>Act-Rules</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 15:31:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=56344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>