https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54206 Restoration of an appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a stay order was refused where the appellant delayed compliance with the required pre-deposit without a convincing explanation. The Tribunal found prolonged default and lack of diligence in prosecuting the appeal, and held that restoration in such circumstances would undermine compliance with stay conditions by allowing parties to ignore deposit obligations until after dismissal. The restoration request was therefore rejected. en-us Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:36:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54206 Restoration of an appeal dismissed for non-compliance with a stay order was refused where the appellant delayed compliance with the required pre-deposit without a convincing explanation. The Tribunal found prolonged default and lack of diligence in prosecuting the appeal, and held that restoration in such circumstances would undermine compliance with stay conditions by allowing parties to ignore deposit obligations until after dismissal. The restoration request was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54206