<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1567 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472080</link>
    <description>Article 226 writ jurisdiction is ordinarily unavailable to challenge an appealable GST order when the statutory appellate remedy remains open. Repeated opportunities of hearing, including personal hearings fixed at the taxpayer&#039;s convenience, must be used before seeking writ review. Failure to participate in those hearings weighs against invoking extraordinary jurisdiction to present factual or legal submissions for the first time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 12:44:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1567 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472080</link>
      <description>Article 226 writ jurisdiction is ordinarily unavailable to challenge an appealable GST order when the statutory appellate remedy remains open. Repeated opportunities of hearing, including personal hearings fixed at the taxpayer&#039;s convenience, must be used before seeking writ review. Failure to participate in those hearings weighs against invoking extraordinary jurisdiction to present factual or legal submissions for the first time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>