https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472078 Intended third-party beneficiaries may enforce a commission expressly reserved for them where a supply contract creates a trust or dedicated fund in their favour, despite no direct privity with the purchaser. An original Indian agent identified in the supply contract remained entitled to the full commission after performing agency functions; unilateral derecognition and replacement did not displace that entitlement where termination was unproved and the later nominee performed no agency function. A later-nominated agent asserting a competing claim may be joined to ensure that entitlement to the same fund binds all claimants and prevents further litigation. en-us Thu, 02 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Sep 2026 12:06:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472078 Intended third-party beneficiaries may enforce a commission expressly reserved for them where a supply contract creates a trust or dedicated fund in their favour, despite no direct privity with the purchaser. An original Indian agent identified in the supply contract remained entitled to the full commission after performing agency functions; unilateral derecognition and replacement did not displace that entitlement where termination was unproved and the later nominee performed no agency function. A later-nominated agent asserting a competing claim may be joined to ensure that entitlement to the same fund binds all claimants and prevents further litigation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Mar 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472078