<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 165 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54200</link>
    <description>Advertisement and publicity charges incurred by a brand owner for its own branded goods, when goods are manufactured on job work basis and the expenditure is not incurred on behalf of the manufacturer, are not includible in the manufacturer&#039;s assessable value for central excise. On that footing, such charges cannot be treated as additional consideration payable by the buyer on behalf of the assessee, and the related duty demand, penalty, and interest fail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 165 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54200</link>
      <description>Advertisement and publicity charges incurred by a brand owner for its own branded goods, when goods are manufactured on job work basis and the expenditure is not incurred on behalf of the manufacturer, are not includible in the manufacturer&#039;s assessable value for central excise. On that footing, such charges cannot be treated as additional consideration payable by the buyer on behalf of the assessee, and the related duty demand, penalty, and interest fail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>