<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 127 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54193</link>
    <description>Full reversal of CENVAT credit on inputs removes the bar in Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. that denies exemption where input duty credit has been taken. The text notes that, once the assessee proved complete reversal of the credit already availed, the exemption could be validly opted for under the Board&#039;s clarification permitting reversal in lieu of credit. On that basis, the denial of the notification benefit was unsustainable and the assessee remained entitled to exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:09:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 127 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54193</link>
      <description>Full reversal of CENVAT credit on inputs removes the bar in Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. that denies exemption where input duty credit has been taken. The text notes that, once the assessee proved complete reversal of the credit already availed, the exemption could be validly opted for under the Board&#039;s clarification permitting reversal in lieu of credit. On that basis, the denial of the notification benefit was unsustainable and the assessee remained entitled to exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>