<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1849 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472073</link>
    <description>Consent terms signed by the parties and their representatives were taken on record in two commercial suits. The recorded undertakings were accepted, and both suits were decreed in accordance with their respective consent terms. Drawing up of formal decrees was dispensed with, related notices of motion were disposed of, and any court-fee refund was left to be governed by applicable rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 11:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926676" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1849 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472073</link>
      <description>Consent terms signed by the parties and their representatives were taken on record in two commercial suits. The recorded undertakings were accepted, and both suits were decreed in accordance with their respective consent terms. Drawing up of formal decrees was dispensed with, related notices of motion were disposed of, and any court-fee refund was left to be governed by applicable rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>