<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1926 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799900</link>
    <description>Criminal process cannot be used to recover contractual dues where allegations do not disclose essential criminal ingredients; the civil-works payment proceedings were quashed. An Enforcement Case Information Report under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act is not automatically invalidated by technical quashing of predicate FIRs when the underlying scheduled-offence complaint survives without merits exoneration; the 2022 ECIR and summons continued. Homebuyer allegations of non-delivery, double sale, multiple financing and fund diversion prima facie warranted investigation, and buyer payments may constitute deposits under the Karnataka deposit-protection law. The 2025 ECIR and provisional attachment remained subject to statutory adjudication and review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:34:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1926 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799900</link>
      <description>Criminal process cannot be used to recover contractual dues where allegations do not disclose essential criminal ingredients; the civil-works payment proceedings were quashed. An Enforcement Case Information Report under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act is not automatically invalidated by technical quashing of predicate FIRs when the underlying scheduled-offence complaint survives without merits exoneration; the 2022 ECIR and summons continued. Homebuyer allegations of non-delivery, double sale, multiple financing and fund diversion prima facie warranted investigation, and buyer payments may constitute deposits under the Karnataka deposit-protection law. The 2025 ECIR and provisional attachment remained subject to statutory adjudication and review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>