<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1932 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799906</link>
    <description>Interim status quo and stay protection pending appeal were declined because a Civil Court restraint order remained in force, competing property interests were asserted, and applications for intervention and impleadment were pending. Objections and rejoinder were directed, and the application was listed with the appeal. No additional interim protection was granted at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1932 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799906</link>
      <description>Interim status quo and stay protection pending appeal were declined because a Civil Court restraint order remained in force, competing property interests were asserted, and applications for intervention and impleadment were pending. Objections and rejoinder were directed, and the application was listed with the appeal. No additional interim protection was granted at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>