<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1943 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799917</link>
    <description>EPCG exemption under Notification No. 16/2015-Customs remains available despite non-registration of the authorisation at the original import port, non-production for debit at clearance, and absence of the prescribed undertaking where capital goods were initially imported under the export-oriented unit scheme and later debonded. Furnishing the EPCG authorisation and required particulars to jurisdictional authorities, obtaining exit and no-dues permissions, undertaking the export obligation, and providing an undertaking for future duty shortfall substantially satisfy the notification&#039;s conditions. Such defects constitute procedural lapses rather than substantive non-compliance warranting denial of exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:34:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1943 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799917</link>
      <description>EPCG exemption under Notification No. 16/2015-Customs remains available despite non-registration of the authorisation at the original import port, non-production for debit at clearance, and absence of the prescribed undertaking where capital goods were initially imported under the export-oriented unit scheme and later debonded. Furnishing the EPCG authorisation and required particulars to jurisdictional authorities, obtaining exit and no-dues permissions, undertaking the export obligation, and providing an undertaking for future duty shortfall substantially satisfy the notification&#039;s conditions. Such defects constitute procedural lapses rather than substantive non-compliance warranting denial of exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>