<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 162 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54183</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision. The duty was deemed inapplicable due to a classification mismatch, and the Department was barred from increasing the demand amount beyond the show cause notice scope. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate classification for duty imposition and adherence to statutory provisions on corrections in orders, ultimately upholding the original decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:19:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 162 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54183</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision. The duty was deemed inapplicable due to a classification mismatch, and the Department was barred from increasing the demand amount beyond the show cause notice scope. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate classification for duty imposition and adherence to statutory provisions on corrections in orders, ultimately upholding the original decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>