<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 159 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54180</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowed the appeal by the Revenue, and remanded the case for further examination regarding the applicability of Notification No. 14/92 and recalculating the duty demand considering the benefit of Modvat credit. The Tribunal held that duty demand could be raised for six months, but adjustments were required in duty calculation to include the benefit of Modvat credit for inputs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:54:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 159 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54180</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowed the appeal by the Revenue, and remanded the case for further examination regarding the applicability of Notification No. 14/92 and recalculating the duty demand considering the benefit of Modvat credit. The Tribunal held that duty demand could be raised for six months, but adjustments were required in duty calculation to include the benefit of Modvat credit for inputs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>