<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Evidentiary substantiation in assessments: unsupported cash deposits, land-facilitation receipts, and GST sales supported additions and business-income treatment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104305</link>
    <description>Natural justice is not breached where the taxpayer receives repeated opportunities, issue-specific show-cause notices, and consideration of replies and evidence; the challenge to assessment validity therefore failed. Cash deposits require credible proof of source and a transaction-specific cash trail; unsupported deposits were treated as unexplained money. Consideration for land-facilitation work was characterised as business income because the land was not established as a capital asset and no refundable obligation was proved. GST-reported sales omitted from the revised income-tax return were treated as undisclosed business receipts absent cogent rebuttal. The contested additions and assessment were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:34:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:34:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Evidentiary substantiation in assessments: unsupported cash deposits, land-facilitation receipts, and GST sales supported additions and business-income treatment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104305</link>
      <description>Natural justice is not breached where the taxpayer receives repeated opportunities, issue-specific show-cause notices, and consideration of replies and evidence; the challenge to assessment validity therefore failed. Cash deposits require credible proof of source and a transaction-specific cash trail; unsupported deposits were treated as unexplained money. Consideration for land-facilitation work was characterised as business income because the land was not established as a capital asset and no refundable obligation was proved. GST-reported sales omitted from the revised income-tax return were treated as undisclosed business receipts absent cogent rebuttal. The contested additions and assessment were sustained.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:34:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>