<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Treaty-rate dividend tax refund claim remitted pending larger Bench ruling; commercially expedient media research expenditure remained deductible.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104302</link>
    <description>Additional claim for refund of excess dividend distribution tax on dividends paid to a Singapore shareholder at the treaty rate was admitted and remitted to the Assessing Officer for consideration after the Supreme Court larger Bench resolves the underlying issue. Reference to a larger Bench does not, by itself, prevent the Tribunal from following binding jurisdictional High Court precedent, although the merits were left open. Market research and media-measurement expenditure incurred by a media agency was treated as revenue expenditure because client agreements, invoices and the business model established commercial expediency and business nexus; absent contrary material on genuineness, quantum or reasonableness, deletion of disallowance was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:34:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:34:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Treaty-rate dividend tax refund claim remitted pending larger Bench ruling; commercially expedient media research expenditure remained deductible.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104302</link>
      <description>Additional claim for refund of excess dividend distribution tax on dividends paid to a Singapore shareholder at the treaty rate was admitted and remitted to the Assessing Officer for consideration after the Supreme Court larger Bench resolves the underlying issue. Reference to a larger Bench does not, by itself, prevent the Tribunal from following binding jurisdictional High Court precedent, although the merits were left open. Market research and media-measurement expenditure incurred by a media agency was treated as revenue expenditure because client agreements, invoices and the business model established commercial expediency and business nexus; absent contrary material on genuineness, quantum or reasonableness, deletion of disallowance was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:34:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>