<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Agricultural produce classification excludes manufactured rice bran products, invalidating market-fee treatment while core market-law amendments remain valid.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104285</link>
    <description>Rice bran oil and de-oiled rice bran produced through technical extraction and refining are manufactured commodities, not processed agricultural produce. The Schedule cannot expand the statutory definition of agricultural produce; executive inclusion of those products, consequential market-fee demands, and associated orders were invalid, with refund of paid fees directed. Market-fee amendments did not directly or immediately restrict movement of goods under Article 301 and did not require prior Presidential sanction. The special deemed-sale definition validly prevents fee evasion and is compatible with the Sale of Goods Act. Availability of market-wide regulatory services, rather than actual individual use, supports a fee levy on covered produce. Industrial and agricultural-market regulation operate in distinct fields, so no repugnancy arises.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:34:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:34:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Agricultural produce classification excludes manufactured rice bran products, invalidating market-fee treatment while core market-law amendments remain valid.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104285</link>
      <description>Rice bran oil and de-oiled rice bran produced through technical extraction and refining are manufactured commodities, not processed agricultural produce. The Schedule cannot expand the statutory definition of agricultural produce; executive inclusion of those products, consequential market-fee demands, and associated orders were invalid, with refund of paid fees directed. Market-fee amendments did not directly or immediately restrict movement of goods under Article 301 and did not require prior Presidential sanction. The special deemed-sale definition validly prevents fee evasion and is compatible with the Sale of Goods Act. Availability of market-wide regulatory services, rather than actual individual use, supports a fee levy on covered produce. Industrial and agricultural-market regulation operate in distinct fields, so no repugnancy arises.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 08:34:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>