<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2156 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472058</link>
    <description>Loans supported by lender affidavits, confirmations, bank statements and source-of-funds records satisfied the requirements of identity, transaction genuineness and lender creditworthiness for Section 68 purposes. With no specific adverse findings in the remand report on these evidentiary elements, the short interval before loan repayment did not by itself discredit the transactions. The addition as unexplained cash credits was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 20:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2156 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472058</link>
      <description>Loans supported by lender affidavits, confirmations, bank statements and source-of-funds records satisfied the requirements of identity, transaction genuineness and lender creditworthiness for Section 68 purposes. With no specific adverse findings in the remand report on these evidentiary elements, the short interval before loan repayment did not by itself discredit the transactions. The addition as unexplained cash credits was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>