<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 149 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54162</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the original order of absolute confiscation and penalty, ruling that the appellant did not misdeclare the goods. It set aside the confiscation and penalty, directing the release of the goods upon payment of the correct customs duty. The Tribunal remanded the case for accurate valuation under Customs Valuation Rules, allowing the appellant to clear the goods by paying the appropriate duty based on the declared value of HK $2500.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 149 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54162</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the original order of absolute confiscation and penalty, ruling that the appellant did not misdeclare the goods. It set aside the confiscation and penalty, directing the release of the goods upon payment of the correct customs duty. The Tribunal remanded the case for accurate valuation under Customs Valuation Rules, allowing the appellant to clear the goods by paying the appropriate duty based on the declared value of HK $2500.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>