<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>JAO/FAO Story takes a new turn... P&amp;H HC Strikes Down Section 147A: Revenue&#039;s counter in KAR HC terms P&amp;H HC&#039;s JAO-FAO judgment as &#039;patently erroneous&#039;[Section 147A of ITA&#039;61 &amp; Section 279(3) of ITA&#039;25]</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17473</link>
    <description>Section 147A, retrospectively inserted with effect from 1 April 2021, purports to validate reassessment notices issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officers. Through a non-obstante clause, it overrides section 151A and judicial pronouncements, and treats the Assessing Officer for sections 148 and 148A as the jurisdictional officer rather than the National Faceless Assessment Centre. The central issue is whether prescribed faceless allocation is mandatory and whether retrospective validation can displace that procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:13:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:13:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>JAO/FAO Story takes a new turn... P&amp;H HC Strikes Down Section 147A: Revenue&#039;s counter in KAR HC terms P&amp;H HC&#039;s JAO-FAO judgment as &#039;patently erroneous&#039;[Section 147A of ITA&#039;61 &amp; Section 279(3) of ITA&#039;25]</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17473</link>
      <description>Section 147A, retrospectively inserted with effect from 1 April 2021, purports to validate reassessment notices issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officers. Through a non-obstante clause, it overrides section 151A and judicial pronouncements, and treats the Assessing Officer for sections 148 and 148A as the jurisdictional officer rather than the National Faceless Assessment Centre. The central issue is whether prescribed faceless allocation is mandatory and whether retrospective validation can displace that procedure.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:13:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=17473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>