<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1852 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799826</link>
    <description>Private complaints concerning offences under section 447 raise questions about the bar on Special Court cognizance, the scope of Special Court jurisdiction over Companies Act and related offences, and allegations of abuse of process. The second proviso to section 212(6) permits the Union of India to authorise, through a written general or special order, a Central Government officer to institute a complaint in addition to the Director of the Serious Fraud Investigation Office.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:12:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1852 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799826</link>
      <description>Private complaints concerning offences under section 447 raise questions about the bar on Special Court cognizance, the scope of Special Court jurisdiction over Companies Act and related offences, and allegations of abuse of process. The second proviso to section 212(6) permits the Union of India to authorise, through a written general or special order, a Central Government officer to institute a complaint in addition to the Director of the Serious Fraud Investigation Office.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>