<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1876 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799850</link>
    <description>Ordinary territorial jurisdiction for an appeal and cross-objection follows the location of the Assessing Officer who issued the assessment order, rather than the assessee&#039;s location or that of the appellate authority. Where the originating assessment order was issued by an Assessing Officer at Chennai, the Mumbai Bench lacked jurisdiction over both proceedings. The parties may pursue them before the appropriate jurisdictional Bench, with merits remaining open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:12:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1876 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799850</link>
      <description>Ordinary territorial jurisdiction for an appeal and cross-objection follows the location of the Assessing Officer who issued the assessment order, rather than the assessee&#039;s location or that of the appellate authority. Where the originating assessment order was issued by an Assessing Officer at Chennai, the Mumbai Bench lacked jurisdiction over both proceedings. The parties may pursue them before the appropriate jurisdictional Bench, with merits remaining open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>