<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 149 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54150</link>
    <description>A product used for pre-surgical hand sterilisation, cleansing wounds and minor cuts, and disinfecting skin before surgery was treated as a medicament because it had therapeutic and prophylactic use and was manufactured under a drug licence. Prior classification of an identical product as medicament was followed, so the product was held classifiable under chapter sub-heading 3003.10 and not as a disinfectant under 3808.90.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:16:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 149 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54150</link>
      <description>A product used for pre-surgical hand sterilisation, cleansing wounds and minor cuts, and disinfecting skin before surgery was treated as a medicament because it had therapeutic and prophylactic use and was manufactured under a drug licence. Prior classification of an identical product as medicament was followed, so the product was held classifiable under chapter sub-heading 3003.10 and not as a disinfectant under 3808.90.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>