<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2135 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472020</link>
    <description>An electronically filed first appeal lodged within the prescribed 30-day period cannot be treated as time-barred on an unsupported calculation of delay. For cash deposits during demonetisation, documented prior cash withdrawals may provide a plausible and sufficient explanation of source; deposits so explained do not constitute unexplained money under section 69A. On the stated facts, the limitation objection fails and the cash-deposit addition is unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 15:27:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2135 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472020</link>
      <description>An electronically filed first appeal lodged within the prescribed 30-day period cannot be treated as time-barred on an unsupported calculation of delay. For cash deposits during demonetisation, documented prior cash withdrawals may provide a plausible and sufficient explanation of source; deposits so explained do not constitute unexplained money under section 69A. On the stated facts, the limitation objection fails and the cash-deposit addition is unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>