<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2136 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472021</link>
    <description>Alleged bogus purchases require an evidence-based estimated disallowance where the taxpayer has not fully established genuineness but the tax authorities cannot disregard available supporting evidence. Rather than disallowing the entire purchase amount, the appropriate adjustment was confined to 15% of the purchases, reflecting both evidentiary deficiencies and evidence supporting the underlying transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 15:27:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2136 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472021</link>
      <description>Alleged bogus purchases require an evidence-based estimated disallowance where the taxpayer has not fully established genuineness but the tax authorities cannot disregard available supporting evidence. Rather than disallowing the entire purchase amount, the appropriate adjustment was confined to 15% of the purchases, reflecting both evidentiary deficiencies and evidence supporting the underlying transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>