<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 115 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54148</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal related to denial of Modvat credit to the appellants. The Tribunal found the ground of dealer takeover issue for disallowance of credit legally untenable. The appellants received goods with duty paid valid invoices from a registered dealer, and their use of the goods was undisputed. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:12:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 115 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54148</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the appeal related to denial of Modvat credit to the appellants. The Tribunal found the ground of dealer takeover issue for disallowance of credit legally untenable. The appellants received goods with duty paid valid invoices from a registered dealer, and their use of the goods was undisputed. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>