<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 114 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54146</link>
    <description>Suspension of a Customs House Agent licence under the 2004 Licensing Regulations was unjustified because the alleged grounds were not supported by evidence. The persons acting for the agent were treated as employees within the licence arrangement, and the other alleged omissions and commissions were not shown to be strictly connected with clearance of goods handled by the agent. The suspension order was therefore set aside, while the Commissioner was left free to pursue revocation or other action under the Regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:59:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 114 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54146</link>
      <description>Suspension of a Customs House Agent licence under the 2004 Licensing Regulations was unjustified because the alleged grounds were not supported by evidence. The persons acting for the agent were treated as employees within the licence arrangement, and the other alleged omissions and commissions were not shown to be strictly connected with clearance of goods handled by the agent. The suspension order was therefore set aside, while the Commissioner was left free to pursue revocation or other action under the Regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>