<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1751 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799725</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted in allegations of cess and excise-duty evasion because the suspected evasion calculation, derived solely from seized machinery under the prescribed formula, raised a prima facie doubt. The observation was limited to bail and neither determined the Rule&#039;s validity nor bound the trial court. Absence of prior antecedents, seizure of the machinery, and an unsupported apprehension of repeated conduct weighed against continued custody.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 09:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1751 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799725</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted in allegations of cess and excise-duty evasion because the suspected evasion calculation, derived solely from seized machinery under the prescribed formula, raised a prima facie doubt. The observation was limited to bail and neither determined the Rule&#039;s validity nor bound the trial court. Absence of prior antecedents, seizure of the machinery, and an unsupported apprehension of repeated conduct weighed against continued custody.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>