<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1766 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799740</link>
    <description>Penalty for abetment of an attempted illegal export requires proof of intentional assistance and active complicity; suspicion or failure to detect concealed currency is insufficient. An uncorroborated co-noticee statement alleging payment, without recovery of money, CCTV footage, or other independent evidence, cannot establish facilitation. Electronic text-message printouts lack evidentiary value unless supported by the required certificate and forensic material linking them to the alleged person&#039;s device. A bona fide examination performed in the ordinary discharge of official duty may also attract statutory protection. Accordingly, the essential elements of abetment were not established and the penalty was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1766 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799740</link>
      <description>Penalty for abetment of an attempted illegal export requires proof of intentional assistance and active complicity; suspicion or failure to detect concealed currency is insufficient. An uncorroborated co-noticee statement alleging payment, without recovery of money, CCTV footage, or other independent evidence, cannot establish facilitation. Electronic text-message printouts lack evidentiary value unless supported by the required certificate and forensic material linking them to the alleged person&#039;s device. A bona fide examination performed in the ordinary discharge of official duty may also attract statutory protection. Accordingly, the essential elements of abetment were not established and the penalty was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>