<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Review of regular bail grants requires perversity or illegality, leaving bail in telephone-interception proceedings undisturbed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104187</link>
    <description>Review of an original regular-bail grant is limited to perversity, illegality, non-application of mind, irrelevant considerations, or omission of relevant circumstances; it differs from cancellation based on later misconduct, breach of conditions, or supervening circumstances. A connected PMLA bail order arising from the same FIR may be relevant but is not conclusive in CBI proceedings, which require an independent assessment of each accused&#039;s role. In the alleged unauthorised telephone-interception proceedings, consideration of objections, individual roles, and bail conditions precluded a finding of mechanical parity or defective discretion. The challenges to regular bail were dismissed, and the Trial Court must remain uninfluenced by prima facie bail observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 08:31:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 08:31:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Review of regular bail grants requires perversity or illegality, leaving bail in telephone-interception proceedings undisturbed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104187</link>
      <description>Review of an original regular-bail grant is limited to perversity, illegality, non-application of mind, irrelevant considerations, or omission of relevant circumstances; it differs from cancellation based on later misconduct, breach of conditions, or supervening circumstances. A connected PMLA bail order arising from the same FIR may be relevant but is not conclusive in CBI proceedings, which require an independent assessment of each accused&#039;s role. In the alleged unauthorised telephone-interception proceedings, consideration of objections, individual roles, and bail conditions precluded a finding of mechanical parity or defective discretion. The challenges to regular bail were dismissed, and the Trial Court must remain uninfluenced by prima facie bail observations.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 08:31:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>