<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2122 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471990</link>
    <description>Limitation for reassessment under section 149 and valid sanction under section 151 are mandatory jurisdictional conditions. For AYs 2013-14 and 2014-15, the surviving period after exclusion of the response period and the minimum extension had expired before notices were issued; for AY 2015-16, the relaxation scheme did not preserve action initiated from 1 April 2021. For AYs 2016-17 and 2017-18, reassessment initiated more than three years after year-end required approval from the authority specified under section 151(ii). Approval from an authority other than the prescribed authority invalidated jurisdiction, leaving the merits of additions unadjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 20:15:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2122 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471990</link>
      <description>Limitation for reassessment under section 149 and valid sanction under section 151 are mandatory jurisdictional conditions. For AYs 2013-14 and 2014-15, the surviving period after exclusion of the response period and the minimum extension had expired before notices were issued; for AY 2015-16, the relaxation scheme did not preserve action initiated from 1 April 2021. For AYs 2016-17 and 2017-18, reassessment initiated more than three years after year-end required approval from the authority specified under section 151(ii). Approval from an authority other than the prescribed authority invalidated jurisdiction, leaving the merits of additions unadjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>