<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2120 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472005</link>
    <description>Income-tax reimbursement recoverable by a central generating company from beneficiaries forms part of electricity tariff. The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission has jurisdiction under the tariff framework to determine beneficiary objections to the amount claimed, with applicable regulations allowing direct recovery and an application for objections. Tariff regulations and contractual arrangements remain binding unless challenged as ultra vires. Re-determination, limitation, quantification and supporting evidence require factual adjudication before the specialised statutory forum, where beneficiaries may raise objections. That process provides an opportunity to be heard and meets natural-justice requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 20:15:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=926008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2120 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472005</link>
      <description>Income-tax reimbursement recoverable by a central generating company from beneficiaries forms part of electricity tariff. The Central Electricity Regulatory Commission has jurisdiction under the tariff framework to determine beneficiary objections to the amount claimed, with applicable regulations allowing direct recovery and an application for objections. Tariff regulations and contractual arrangements remain binding unless challenged as ultra vires. Re-determination, limitation, quantification and supporting evidence require factual adjudication before the specialised statutory forum, where beneficiaries may raise objections. That process provides an opportunity to be heard and meets natural-justice requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>